Killing Targets
The US administration has said that its covert, targeted killings with remote-controlled aircraft in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia (and potentially beyond) are proper under both domestic and international law. It has said that the targets are chosen under strict criteria, with rigourous internal oversight. It has parried reports of collateral damage and the alleged killing of innocents by saying that drones, with their surveillance capabilities and precision missiles, result in far fewer mistakes than less sophisticated weapons. Yet in carrying out hundreds of strikes over 3 years — resulting in an estimated 1,350 to 2,250 deaths in Pakistan — it has provided virtually no details to support those assertions. Since September, at least 60 people have died in 14 reported CIA drone strikes in Pakistan’s tribal regions. The Obama administration has named only one of the dead. The identities of the rest remain classified, as does the existence of the drone programme itself. It is impossible for anyone without access to US intelligence to assess whether the deaths were justified. [Since they only named one of the dead, perhaps only one actually hit its intended target? Secrecy could cover shame.]